Il metodo comparativo nello studio dei rapporti tra il Domostroj e i suoi equivalenti europei Eugène Priadko Sorbonne University, France This is a section of Russia, Oriente slavo e Occidente europeo. Fratture e integrazioni nella storia e nella civiltà letteraria(DOI: 10.36253/978-88-6453-507-4) by Claudia Pieralli, Claire Delaunay, Eugène Priadko Firenze University Press Firenze 2017 https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-507-4.07

Available for academic research purposes

Open Access

Copyright Author(s)

Content licence CC BY 4.0

Metadata licence CC0 1.0

This is original content, published for academic research purposes

 Digital edition XML powered by Booksflow

The article adresses the well-known question about the eventual links between the Old Russian Domostroi and the European domestic handbooks and focuses on the aporia to which lead all the previous comparative works. The methodological character of the impasse apears clearly when we analyze those works in the light of a clearly defined comparative method. As a result, the author suggests to address the relationships between the Domostroi and its European analogues no more from the traditional literary point of view but from a historical one.

 Domostroi European Domestic Handbooks Comparative Method Comparative History

It is available online at https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-507-4.07

References Babudri, F. 1954. La figura del rimatore barese Schiavo nell’ambiente sociale e letterario duecentesco di Puglia e d’Italia. Società di Storia Patria per la Puglia, Collezione del Premio Regionale di Studi Storici, I. Bari. Bloch, M. 1928. “Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés européennes”. Revue de synthèse historique, XLVI: 315-50. Bloncourt-Herselin, J., Durand, R.-H. 1965. Les auteurs italiens: textes choisis, littérature, histoire, civilisation. Paris. Brereton, G.E., Ferrier, J.M. (a cura di). 2010. Le Mesnagier de Paris. Le Livre de Poche. Domostroj. 1994. Domostroj. A cura di V.V. Kolesov, V.V. Roždestvenskaja. Sankt-Peterburg. Erben, K.J. (a cura di). 1852. Tomáše ze Štitného knižky šestery o obecných věcech křesťanských. Praha. Hroch, M. 1985. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations. Cambridge. Janin, V.L., Zaliznjak, A.A., Gippius, A.A. (a cura di). 2004. Novgorodskije gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 1997-2000 gg.). Moskva. Kaštanov, S.M. 1992. “O tipe Russkogo gosudarstva XIVXVI vv.”, in Čtenija pamjati V.B. Kobrina “Problemy otečestvenoj istorii i kul’tury perioda feodalizma”. Tezisy dokladov i soobščenij. Moskva: 85-92. Kolesov, V.V. (a cura di). 1990. Domostroj. Moskva. Kolesov, V.V. 1994. Domostroj kak pamjatnik srednevekovoj kul’tury, in Domostroj. A cura di V.V. Kolesov e V.V. Roždestvenskaja. Sankt-Peterburg: 301-356. Krom, M.M. 2005. “La monarchie russe à la lumière de la crise politique des années 1530-1540”. Cahiers du monde russe, 46: 211-218. Krom, M.M. 2015. Vvedenije v istoričeskuju komparativistiku. Sankt-Peterburg. Nekrasov, I.S. 1872. “Opyt istoriko-literaturnogo issledovanija o proisvoždenii drevnerusskogo Domostroja”. Čtenija v Imperatorskom obščestve istorii i drevnostej rossijskich, I. Issledovanija, 3: 1-184. Orlov, A. 1917. Domostroj. Izsledovanije, čast’ I. Moskva. Pančenko, A.M. (a cura di). 1970. Russkaja sillabičeskaja poesija XVII-XVIII vv. Leningrad. Pandolfini, A. 1802. Trattato del governo della famiglia d’Agnolo Pandolfini colla vita del medesimo scritta da Vespasiano da Bisticci. Milano. Poukka, H. 1966. “O vozmožnom pol’skom istočnike Domostroja”. Scando-Slavia, XII: 119-122. Pouncy, C.J. 1985. The Domostroi as a Source for Muscovite History. Stanford University, Ph.D. Romagnoli, G. (a cura di). 1865. Dottrina dello schiavo di Bari. Secondo la lezione di tre antichi testi a penna. Bologna. Sewell, W.H. 1967. “Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History”. History and Theory, VI.2: 208-218. Sreznevskij, I.I. 1893. Materialy dlja slovarja drevne-russkogo slovarja po pis’mennym pamjatnikam, I (A-K). Sankt-Peterburg. Voisine-Jechova, H. 2001. Histoire de la littérature tchèque. Fayard.