<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main" level="a">Leveraging Smart Contracts in Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Unified Project Execution: A Theoretical Framework.</title>
        <author>
          <persName n="1" ref="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-9126" type="ORCID">
            <forename>Oluwatoyin</forename>
            <surname>Lawal</surname>
            <placeName type="affiliation">University of Florida, United States</placeName>
          </persName>
          <persName n="2" ref="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-8347" type="ORCID">
            <forename>Nawari</forename>
            <surname>Nawari</surname>
            <placeName type="affiliation">University of Florida, United States</placeName>
          </persName>
        </author>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>This is a section of <title>CONVR 2023 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on  Construction Applications of Virtual Reality </title>(DOI: <idno type="DOI">10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3</idno>) by </resp>
          <name>Pietro Capone, Vito Getuli, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Nashwan Dawood, Alessandro Bruttini, Tommaso Sorbi</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Firenze University Press</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Florence</pubPlace>
        <date when="2023">2023</date>
        <idno type="DOI">https://doi.org/10.36253/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.34</idno>
        <availability>
          <p>Available for academic research purposes</p>
          <p>Open Access</p>
          <p>Copyright Author(s)</p>
          <licence source="text" target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode">
            <p>Content licence CC BY-NC 4.0</p>
          </licence>
          <licence source="metadata" target="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode">
            <p>Metadata licence CC0 1.0</p>
          </licence>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>This is original content, published for academic research purposes</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <appInfo>
        <application version="2.2" ident="Booksflow">
          <desc>Digital edition XML powered by Booksflow</desc>
        </application>
      </appInfo>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>Over time, several procurement methods have been adopted to facilitate the successful delivery of construction projects with minimal financial losses in order to offer maximum value to clients. In recent years, the Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) procurement model has been introduced for better overall financial performance. In this model, every member of the project team has a stake in overall profit or risk irrespective of the extent of their roles and change orders and correction of errors and omissions are managed effectively with minimal contractual disruptions. This paper aims to address some of the previously cited barriers in earlier scholarly work, and it proposes a conceptual framework that integrates two novel concepts towards tackling technological and financial barriers in adopting IPD namely, BIM and Smart Contracts (SC).  A framework is developed for a BIM-blockchain-IPD whereby the BIM model is integrated with blockchain technology, thereby acting as an immutable and transparent information repository and a platform for interdisciplinary collaboration in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) projects. The smart contract feature of blockchain technology offers an automated equitable distribution of risk and reward amongst project stakeholders based on agreements at project inception. Thus, the research contributes to a more efficient project delivery method by avoiding information asymmetry amongst stakeholders through a tamper-proof, BIM-enabled Common Data Environment (CDE). The proposed framework is validated with qualitative analysis of information obtained based on AEC industry procurement workflows</p>
      </abstract>
      <textClass>
        <keywords>
          <list>
            <item>Integrated Project Delivery</item>
            <item>Smart Contract</item>
            <item>Blockchain</item>
            <item>BIM</item>
            <item>AEC</item>
            <item>Common Data Environment</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p>It is available online at https://doi.org/10.36253/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.34<ref target="https://doi.org/10.36253/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.34" /></p>
      <div>
        <listBibl>
          <head>References</head>
          <bibl n="138240">AIA California Council. (2007). Integrated Project Delivery, a guide. American Institute of Architects. Retrieved August 08, 2023, from https://info.aia.org/SiteObjects/files/IPD_Guide_2007.pdf</bibl>
          <bibl n="138019">
            <bibl>Alaloul, W. S., Hasaniyah, M. W., &amp;amp; Tayeh, B. A. (2019). A comprehensive review of disputes prevention and resolution in construction projects. MATEC web of conferences. 270, p. p. 05012. EDP Sciences.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1051/matecconf/201927005012</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137877">
            <bibl>Ali, F., &amp;amp; Haapasalo, H. (2023). Development levels of stakeholder relationships in collaborative projects: challenges and preconditions. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(8), 58-76.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/IJMPB-03-2022-0066/full/html</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138562">Azhar, S., Khalfan, M., &amp;amp; Maqsood, T. (2012). Building Information Modeling (BIM): Now and beyond. The Australasian journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(4), 15 - 28.</bibl>
          <bibl n="138527">
            <bibl>Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., &amp;amp; Fogli, D. (2019). A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE access, 7, 167653-167671.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138799">
            <bibl>Cox, A., &amp;amp; Ireland, P. (2002). Managing construction supply chains: the common sense approach. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 9(5/6), 409-418.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/eb021235</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137047">
            <bibl>Durdyev, S., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Ismail, S., &amp;amp; Arashpour, M. (2020). Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): a quantified model for Malaysia. Journal of Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 186-204.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0535</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="136782">
            <bibl>Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Aigbedion, M., Ogbaini, I. F., &amp;amp; Aginah, I. L. (2023). Integrated project delivery in the Nigerian construction sector: An unexplored approach from the stakeholders’ perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(4), 1519-1535.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0823</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138713">
            <bibl>Elghaish, F., Abrishami, S., &amp;amp; Hosseini, M. R. (2020). Integrated project delivery with blockchain: An automated financial system. Automation in Construction, 114, 103182.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103182</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137218">
            <bibl>Elghaish, F., Abrishami, S., Hosseini, M. R., &amp;amp; Abu-Samra, S. (2021). Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: a BIM-based solution. Journal of Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(4), 1214-1240.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/ECAM-04-2019-0222</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137878">Heidemann, A., &amp;amp; Gehbauer, F. (2010). Cooperative project delivery in an environment of strict design-bid-build tender regulations. Proc. 18th Ann. Conf. Int’l. Group for Lean Constr.(IGLC-18), (pp. 591-590).</bibl>
          <bibl n="138070">
            <bibl>Hunhevicz, J. J., Brasey, P.-A., Bonanomi, M. M., &amp;amp; Hall, D. (2020). Blockchain and smart contracts for integrated project delivery: inspiration from the commons. EPOC 2020 Working Paper Proceedings.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000452056</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137352">Ilozor, B. D., &amp;amp; Kelly, D. J. (2012). Building Information Modeling and Integrated Project Delivery in the Commercial Construction Industry: A Conceptual Study. Joumal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2(1), 23-36.</bibl>
          <bibl n="138194">
            <bibl>Jung, W., &amp;amp; Lee, G. (2016, July 1). Slim BIM charts for rapidly visualizing and quantifying levels of BIM adoption and implementation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(4), 04015072.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000554</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138123">Kahvandi, Z., Saghatforoush, E., ZareRavasan, A., &amp;amp; Preece, C. (2019). Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Challenges in the Construction Industry. Civil Engineering Journal, 5(8), 1672-1683.</bibl>
          <bibl n="137353">
            <bibl>Kumar Viswanathan, S., Panwar, A., Kar, S., Lavingiya, R., &amp;amp; Jha, K. N. (2020). Causal modeling of disputes in construction projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 04520035.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000432</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137879">
            <bibl>Lahdenpera, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30(1), 57-79.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1080/01446193.2011.648947</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137169">Lawal, O. O., &amp;amp; Nawari, N. O. (2022). Audit and Provenance Model for Transactions in Real Estate Markets through Blockchain-based Supply Chain Management. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Congress (B2C&amp;#39; 2022) (p. 128). Barcelona: IFSA Publishing.</bibl>
          <bibl n="137650">
            <bibl>Liu, Z., Lu, Y., &amp;amp; Peh, L. C. (2019). A review and scientometric analysis of global building information modeling (BIM) research in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. Buildings, 9(10), 210.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.3390/buildings9100210</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="139305">
            <bibl>Nawari, N., &amp;amp; Ravindran, S. (2019). Blockchain and the built environment: Potentials and limitations. Journal of Building Engineering 25.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100832</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="139406">Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., &amp;amp; Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.</bibl>
          <bibl n="137620">
            <bibl>Phua, F. T., &amp;amp; Rowlinson, S. (2003). Cultural differences as an explanatory variable for adversarial attitudes in the construction industry: the case of Hong Kong. Construction management and economics, 21(7), 777-785.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1080/0144619032000108245</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137746">
            <bibl>Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. (2017). Case studies on the role of integrated project delivery (IPD) approach on the establishment and promotion of trust. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 102-124.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1080/15578771.2016.1226213</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138388">Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., Yoon, J. H., &amp;amp; Dass, N. (2020). Blockchain-based information sharing: A new opportunity for construction supply chains. EPiC Series in Built Environment, 1, 274-282.</bibl>
          <bibl n="139176">
            <bibl>Rahman, M. M., &amp;amp; Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004). Contracting relationship trends and transitions. Journal of management in engineering, 20(4), 147-161.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:4(147)</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="139341">
            <bibl>Rowlinson, S. (2017). Building information modelling, integrated project delivery and all that. Construction innovation, 17(1), 45-49.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1108/CI-05-2016-0025</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138918">Roy, D., Malsane, S., &amp;amp; Samanta, P. K. (2018). Identification of Critical Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Project Delivery. Lean Construction Journal, 1-15.</bibl>
          <bibl n="137056">
            <bibl>Sahal, R., Alsamhi, S. H., Brown, K. N., O&amp;#39;Shea, D., &amp;amp; Alouffi, B. (2022). Blockchain-based digital twins collaboration for smart pandemic alerting: decentralized COVID-19 pandemic alerting use case. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1155/2022/7786441</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137621">Sreckovic, M., Sibenik, G., Sigalov, K., Ye, X., Konig, M., &amp;amp; Reitmayer, K. (2021). Upkeeping digital assets during construction using blockchain technology. Proc. of the Conference CIB W78, 2021, pp. 11-15. Luxembourg.</bibl>
          <bibl n="136654">
            <bibl>Sullivan, J., Asmar, M., Chalhoub, J., &amp;amp; Obeid, H. (2017). Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143(6), 04017009.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137473">
            <bibl>Tao, X., Das, M., Zheng, C., Liu, Y., Wong, P. K.-Y., Xu, Y., . . . Cheng, J. C. (2023). Enhancing BIM security in emergency construction projects using lightweight blockchain-as-a-service. Automation in Construction, 104846.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104846</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138215">
            <bibl>Tao, X., Liu, Y., Wong, P.-Y., Chen, K., Das, M., &amp;amp; Cheng, J. C. (2022). Confidentiality-minded framework for blockchain-based BIM design collaboration. Automation in Construction, 136, 104172.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104172</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138776">
            <bibl>Wang, J., Wu, P., Wang, X., &amp;amp; Shou, W. (2017). The outlook of blockchain technology for construction engineering management. Frontiers of engineering management, 67-75.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.15302/J-FEM-2017006</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137801">
            <bibl>Young-Ybarra, C., &amp;amp; Wiersema, M. (1999). Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: The Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory. Organizational Science, 10(4), 439-459.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1287/orsc.10.4.439</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="137057">
            <bibl>Zhang, T., Doan, D. T., &amp;amp; Kang, J. (2023). Application of building information modeling-blockchain integration in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction / Facilities Management industry: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 77, 107551.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107551</idno>
          </bibl>
          <bibl n="138071">
            <bibl>Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, W., Chen, X., Weng, J., &amp;amp; Imran, M. (2020). An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105, 475-491.</bibl>
            <idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019</idno>
          </bibl>
        </listBibl>
      </div>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>