<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main" level="a">Quaestiones Convivales: composizione e fonti, tradizione e riprese</title>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>This is a section of <title>I miei scritti su Plutarco</title>(DOI: <idno type="DOI">10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6</idno>) by </resp>
          <name>Angelo Casanova</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Firenze University Press</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Florence</pubPlace>
        <date when="2025">2025</date>
        <idno type="DOI">https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6.20</idno>
        <availability>
          <p>Available for academic research purposes</p>
          <p>Open Access</p>
          <p>Copyright Author(s)</p>
          <licence source="text" target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">
            <p>Content licence CC BY 4.0</p>
          </licence>
          <licence source="metadata" target="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode">
            <p>Metadata licence CC0 1.0</p>
          </licence>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>This is original content, published for academic research purposes</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <appInfo>
        <application version="2.2" ident="Booksflow">
          <desc>Digital edition XML powered by Booksflow</desc>
        </application>
      </appInfo>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>Though the Quaestiones Convivales may be considered a ‘minor work’, they nevertheless contain no less than nine books, in which Plutarch, following in the wake of Plato, Xenophon and others, collected in written form the most interesting of the learned conversations that took place during banquets. Since early times scholars have tried to determine whether this work mirrors conversations really held at the table and to what extent it was influenced by literary antecedents. A painstaking philological reading allows a glimpse into Plutarch’s method and leads to the conclusion that the several books should be dated at different times.</p>
      </abstract>
      <textClass>
        <keywords>
          <list>
            <item>Table Talks</item>
            <item>Philosophical tradition</item>
            <item>Hypomnemata</item>
            <item>Collection</item>
            <item>Dating</item>
            <item>Imitations</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p>It is available online at https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6.20<ref target="https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0824-6.20" /></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>