<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="main" level="a">Caso di studio II: la risoluzione su “La coscienza storica europea”</title>
        <author>
          <persName n="1" ref="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-9055" type="ORCID">
            <forename>Andrea</forename>
            <surname>Apollonio</surname>
          </persName>
        </author>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>This is a section of <title>Politiche della memoria e narrazioni sulla storia nel Parlamento europeo</title>(DOI: <idno type="DOI">10.36253/979-12-215-0996-0</idno>) by </resp>
          <name>Andrea Apollonio</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Firenze University Press</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Florence</pubPlace>
        <date when="2026">2026</date>
        <idno type="DOI">https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0996-0.07</idno>
        <availability>
          <p>Available for academic research purposes</p>
          <p>Open Access</p>
          <p>Copyright Author(s)</p>
          <licence source="text" target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">
            <p>Content licence CC BY 4.0</p>
          </licence>
          <licence source="metadata" target="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode">
            <p>Metadata licence CC0 1.0</p>
          </licence>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p>This is original content, published for academic research purposes</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <appInfo>
        <application version="2.2" ident="Booksflow">
          <desc>Digital edition XML powered by Booksflow</desc>
        </application>
      </appInfo>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The chapter examines how Positive Political Theory was institutionalized at Rochester and beyond, tracing its diffusion in the 1960s and 1970s and assessing later developments, including critiques and extensions of Riker’s original framework.</p>
      </abstract>
      <textClass>
        <keywords>
          <list>
            <item>University of Rochester</item>
            <item>Game Theory revolution</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <p>It is available online at https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0996-0.07<ref target="https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0996-0.07" /></p>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>