“Conosci te stesso”: o quello che i progettisti possono imparare dalle scienze biologiche contemporanee Harry Francis Mallgrave Illinois Institute of Technology, United States This is a section of La mente in architettura (DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-286-7) by Sarah Robinson, Juhani Pallasmaa, Matteo Zambelli Firenze University Press Firenze 2021 https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-286-7.03

Available for academic research purposes

Open Access

Copyright Author(s)

Content licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Metadata licence CC0 1.0

This is original content, published for academic research purposes

 Digital edition XML powered by Booksflow

Wherein resides the ‘art’ in the ‘art of building’? Throughout history, architects have generally viewed their field as a craft informed by the human body, a creative sense of play, and technical science. Theory in the second half of the 20 th century departed from this direction by reducing art to the visual and semiotic understanding of form. The remarkable discoveries of the biological sciences in recent decades have opened an entirely new perspective for designers, based on our profound insights into human soci-ality, empathy, emotion, mirror systems, and design’s inherent powers of “tactility and kinesis.” The dictum “know thyself,” once inscribed in stone at the entrance of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi, in many ways holds the key to locating the missing ‘art’ of design.

 empathy emotion mirror systems embodied simulation

It is available online at https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-286-7.03

References Arbib Michael 2012, How the Brain Got Language. The Mirror System Hypothesis, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Arbib Michael 2021, Verso le neuroscienze del processo progettuale, in La mente in architettura. Neuroscienze, incarnazione e il futuro del design, a cura di Sarah Robinson, Juhani Pallasmaatraduzione e cura della versione italiana Matteo Zambelli, Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp. 79-101. Bacon Francis 1803, The Works of Francis Bacon. Book II, J. Johnson et al., Londra. Burke Edmund 1804, Ricerca filosofica sull’origine delle nostre idee intorno al sublime ed al bello con un discorso sopra il gusto e diverse altre aggiunte, Francesco Sonzogno, Milano. Calvo-Merino Beatriz et al. 2008, “Towards a Sensorimotor Aesthetic of Performing Art”, in «Consciousness and Cognition» n. 17, pp. 911-922. Craig A.D. “Bud” 2005, “Forebrain Emotional Asymmetry: A Neuroanatomical Basis?”, in «Trends in Cognitive Sciences» n. 9, pp. 565-570. Dissanayake Ellen 2000, Art and Intimacy. How the Arts Began, University of Washington Press, Seattle. Ebisch Sjored J.H. et al. 2008, “The Sense of Touch. Embodied Simulation in a Visuotactile Mirroring Mechanism for Observed Animate or Inanimate Touch”, in «Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience» n. 20, pp. 1611-1623. Freedberg D., Gallese V. 2007, “Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience”, in «Trends in Cognitive Sciences» n. 11, p. 199. Gibson James 2014, L’approccio ecologico alla percezione visiva, Mimesis Edizioni, Milano-Udine. Hebb Donald 1975, L’organizzazione del comportamento, Franco Angeli, Milano. Ingold Tim 2000, The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, Routledge, Londra, pp. 349-351. Jaques-Dalcroze Émile 1913, “Rhythm as a Factor in Education”, in The Eurhythmics of Jaques-Dalcroze, Small Maynard and Co., Boston. Kawabata Hideaki, Zeki Semir 2004, “Neural Correlates of Beauty”, in «Journal of Neurophysiology» n. 91, pp. 1699-1705. Keysers Christian 2011, The Empathic Brain. How the Discovery of Mirror Neurons Changes Our Understanding of Human Nature, Social Brain Press, Lexington, Kentucky. Lakoff George, Mark Johnson 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, Basic Books, New York. Le Camus de Mézières 1992, The Genius of Architecture; or, the Analogy of that Art with Our Sensations, Getty Publication Programs, Santa Monica. LeDoux Joseph 2002, Il Sé sinaptico. Come il nostro cervello ci fa diventare quelli che siamo, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano. Le Roy J.D. 1764, Histoire de la disposition et des formes differentes que les chrétiens ont donnée à leur temples, Desaind & Saillant, Parig. Mallgrave Harry Francis 2015, L’empatia degli spazi. Architettura e neuroscienze, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano. Neutra Richard 1956, Progettare per sopravvivere, Edizioni di Comunità, Milano. Panksepp Jaak 2005, “On the embodied neural nature of core emotional affects”, in «Journal of Consciousness Studies» n. 12, p. 164. Panksepp Jaak 2006, “Emotional Endophenotypes in Evolutionary Psychiatry”, in «Progress in Neuro-Psychopharacology and Biological Psychiatry» n. 30, pp. 774-784. Pausania 2012, Viaggio in Grecia. Delfi e Focide (Libro X), BUR, Milano. Perrault Claude 1991, “L’ordine dell’Architettura”, in «Aesthetica Preprint», pp. 35-36. Price Uvedale 1794, Essays on the Picturesque as Compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful, Mawman, Londra. Rasmussen Steen Elier 2006, Architettura come esperienza, Pendragon, Bologna. Rizzolatti Giacomo, Sinigaglia Corrado 2006, So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano. Schopenhauer Arthur 2006, Il mondo come volontà e rappresentazione, Bompiani, Milano. Semper Gottfried 1992, Lo stile nelle arti tecniche e tettoniche, o Estetica pratica. Manuale per tecnici, artisti e amatori, Laterza, Roma-Bari. Umiltà M.A., Berchio C., Sestito M., Freedberg D., Gallese V. 2012, “Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study”, in «Frontiers in Human Neuroscience» n. 6, pp. 1-9. Vernon Lee, Anstruther-Thomson Clementina 1912, “Beauty and Ugliness”, in Beauty and Ugliness and Other Studies in Psychological Aesthetics, John Lane the Bodley Head, Londra, pp. 187-189. Vischer Robert 2003, “Sul sentimento ottico della forma”, in Robert Vischer, Friedrich T. Vischer, Simbolo e Forma, Aragno, Torino, pp. 38-39. Watt Douglas F. 2005, “Panksepp’s common sense view of affective neuroscience is not the commonsense view in large areas of neuroscience”, in «Consciousness and Cognition» n. 14, pp. 81-88. Wölfflin Heinrich 2010, Psicologia dell’architettura, Et al./Edizioni, Milano. Zeki Semir, Bartels Andreas 2000, “The Neural Basis of Romantic Love”, in «Neuroreport» 11, n. 17, pp. 3829-3834. Zeki Semir, Andreas Bartels 2004, “The Neural Correlates of Maternal and Romantic Love”, in «Neuroimage» n. 21, pp. 1155-1166.